The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was without fault between the victim B and the victim, but the victim has declared a decision.

No person shall make any codes, text, sound, image, or motion picture that arouses fear or apprehensions through an information and communications network reach another person repeatedly.

가. 피고인은 2017. 3. 22. 18:29 경 불 상의 장소에서, 피해자의 휴대폰으로 " 아들 둘이 아마 놀랠 거다,

C, D, 아들 둘이 미치는 거 한번 바 바, 협박 ㅋㅋ, 사람 잘못 걸 들였어.

“The Kakao Stockholm message was sent.”

B. On the same day as the above paragraph A, the Defendant: (a) at a non-fluent place around 21:29 on the same day; (b) at the Kakakao Stockholm, using the Stockholm, and in the currency with the victim, the Defendant showed a thickness that how much fluents do so in knife and die in knife of the same fluence, and how much fluents do so in knife of the same fluence.

It is not easy to report the contents of the current call to the police, so it is called "Ch. I will look at the sentence for 2 years and 3 years."

(c)

Defendant Around 18:50 of the foregoing month, at the place on the 29th 29th 18:50 of the same month, Kakao Stockholm used Stockholm to the victim and in the currency “the processed matter.”

C. If you can do so, only that can be done

If the knife knife knife knife knife kniff.

(d)

On April 12, 2017, the Defendant ought to display a Kakao Stockholm using the Kakao Stockholm to the victim and to show “inward in the offshore, Kakao Stockholm, his telephone prior to the call, Kakao Stockholm, No. 7 prior to the call, and a photograph to the surrounding people. Furthermore, the Defendant ought to prevent human life.

(b) If death, only such death shall be made.

“...”

마. 피고인은 2017. 5. 19. 22:59 경 불 상의 장소에서, 카카오 톡 보이 스톡을 이용하여 피해자와 통화 중 " 씨 발 쌩깐다 이 거지 씨 발 년이.", " 날 가지고 놀아 두고 보자 씨 벌.", " 월요일부터 보자, C D 한 번 가보자.",...