logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.16 2013고단2070
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around January 8, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidents after Accidents) (hereinafter “Chress”) driving a B MM car on the same day and turn to the left of one lane from the direction of the Egressing Zone at least six-lanes of Sgress of Sgress in the Newdong-dong of Gwangju Mine-gu.

Since there are crosswalks where signal lights are installed, in such cases, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely operate the motor vehicle by reducing speed and checking well the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and entered the string distance from a driving seat to the upper direction of the victim C(63 Dop) who is going to the left-hand turn from the direction of the mast black ray to the front direction of the car of the Defendant. In addition, the Defendant received the left-hand part of the front left-hand part of the vehicle of the Defendant.

At the same time, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, suffered salt ties and tensions that require approximately two weeks medical treatment to the victim, and at the same time, did not immediately stop and stop to rescue the damaged party, and did not take necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the damaged party while leaving the vehicle at the site.

2. On September 2012, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act, while giving and taking over KRW 2.5 million from his/her name in the vicinity of the Incheon Southerndong-gu Incheon Police Agency, the Defendant did not apply for the registration of ownership transfer of the said passenger vehicle without justifiable grounds.

As a result, the Defendant did not apply for the registration of transfer of registered ownership without justifiable reasons.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages is a holder of B M&A car.

The defendant on March 2013

arrow