A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. A thief: (a) around December 2, 2017, the Defendant stolen goods totaling KRW 1,021,850 won from around the above day to February 9, 2018, in total, 56 times, from around 16:23, 201 to around 56 times, in a vinyl fluort, which was prepared in advance at the convenience store operated by the victim D in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, with materials equivalent to KRW 56,00 in the market price, such as 4 cans, 1 bats, 1 bats, and 50 won.

2. On January 22, 2018, the Defendant attempted to larceny: (a) at the H convenience store operated by the victim G in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, the Defendant was aware of an article equivalent to KRW 24,250 of the market price, such as Esluri-ju 4 Slives (Pickick-gu), which was 24,250, and did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement in the preparation of I, J,K, G, L, M, N, P, Q, Q, R, U, V, W, X,Y, Z, AB, AD, AE, AE, AF, AG, AH, and AI;

1. Each investigation report (with respect to the confirmation of the facts of crime, the counter investigation of convenience points, the credit card settlement case for which the victim attempted to make a settlement, securing a card number regarding the transaction details that the victim attempted to make, reply to a search and seizure verification warrant, attaching a written statement and CCTV extract photographs on the victim J case, E-mail visit, seizure of damaged articles, extracted photograph of CCTV images of the crime committed on December 31, 17, and the victim's damage details submitted by the victim);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes is that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflects it, and that it was caused to commit the crimes in an economically inadequate situation, under normal circumstances favorable to the defendant, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case again even though he had the record of punishment already been punished for the same kind of crime, and several times.