logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.12.14 2018고정770
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highly 770] When the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to detailed unknown illness, etc., the Defendant asked the victim E for the theft case that occurred from the D convenience store and the beginning of February 2018, and then damaged the advertisement board in the market price, which was displayed in the carter and displayed in the store.

[2018 고 정 771] 피고인은 상세 불명의 조현 병 등으로 사물을 변별할 능력이나 의사를 결정할 능력이 미약한 상태에서 2018. 2. 8. 05:00 경 부천시 C에 있는 D 편의점 내에서 피해자 E의 감시가 소홀한 틈을 이용하여 시가 1,500원 상당의 꼬깔 콘 한 봉지를 자신의 가방에 넣어 이를 절취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer against the defendant or E;

1. E statements;

1. A report on the occurrence of a thief and CCTV-cape photographs;

1. Application of on-site photographs statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is the first offender, and considering the agreement with the victim);

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part of the charges that dismissed the prosecution of Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of the Nowon-gu Station was assaulted twice by the Defendant’s head of the household who was in possession of the victim E on three occasions due to the occurrence of a dispute at D convenience stores around February 19, 2018.

However, this is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Code, which is against the victim's express will in accordance with Article 260(3) of the Criminal Code.

arrow