logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.05 2018나7442
계약금 반환
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A and B are married, and Plaintiff C, D, and E are children of Plaintiff C, D, and B.

B. On July 2016, Plaintiff B and the Defendant entered into the instant travel contract: (a) the travel period between July 29, 2016 to August 7, 2016, the Plaintiffs; (b) the travel period from July 29, 2016 to August 7, 2016; and (c) the traveled U.S. Algosia and the Sightseeing Islands to “10 days for the cruises & Sightseeing 10 days for the cruise.”

(3) From April 29, 2016 to July 26, 2016, Plaintiff B paid KRW 31,550,000 to the Defendant under the instant travel contract. (d) At around July 2016, Plaintiff B asked whether it is necessary to apply for visa for U.S. entry into the Republic of Korea, and the Defendant’s Staff F was issued on February 8, 2017, the term of validity of the ESA (Electronic Travel Permit) issued on February 2017 to Plaintiff A, B, and D, and the Plaintiff C and D were not required to apply for the ESA for departure from the Republic of Korea, and the 2.00 U.S. travel was not issued on July 16, 2015 to Plaintiff B and the 3.0 U.S. travel from the date of the amendment of the 2016 U.S. Act. No more than the 36.16. The Plaintiffs were issued on February 16, 2015.

arrow