1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.

1. The basic facts;

2. As to this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (from four to eight pages 1) shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

However, part of them shall be cut as follows:

On the six pages of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following 7-8 statements [founded grounds for recognition] shall be added to "A evidence No. 8".

The 7 pages of the judgment of the first instance [Calculation of Unjust Enrichment] shall be written as follows:

구분 기간 임대차계약 종료일 다음날부터 2019. 8. 31.까지 2019. 9. 1.부터 인도 완료일까지 이 사건 제1점포 2017. 7. 3.부터 2019. 8. 31.까지 부당이득금 251,429,474원 월 임대료 상당액 9,694,420원 × (25개월 29일/31일) 을 피고 A로부터 지급받았음을 원고가 자인함 ⇒ 미지급액 없음 월 9,694,420원(임대료 상당액)의 비율로 계산한 부당이득금 이 사건 제2점포 2017. 6. 30.부터 2019. 8. 31.까지 부당이득금 363,490,500원 월 임대료 상당액 13,963,080원 × (26개월 1일/31일) 중 349,585,330원을 피고 A로부터 지급받았음을 원고가 자인함 ⇒ 미지급액 13,905,170원 월 13,963,080원(임대료 상당액)의 비율로 계산한 부당이득금 [부당이득금 계산표]

3. Determination as to a request for extradition against the Defendants and a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment

A. As acknowledged in the above facts, the part concerning the request for extradition against the Defendants 1) The contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant 1 on the first and second lease between the Plaintiff and the Defendant 1 was terminated at the expiration of the entire term. Thus, barring any special circumstance, Defendant A is obliged to deliver the Plaintiff the first and the second shops, which are the leased object (to return).

On the other hand, according to the purport of the evidence Nos. 5 and 8 and the whole purport of the pleadings, Defendant B may recognize the fact that Defendant A has been sub-leased the Nos. 1 and 2 stores of this case without permission from Defendant A prior to the termination of the first and second lease contract of this case.