The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Pedestrians, drivers of motor vehicles, and riders of horses that pass along the main points of the facts charged shall follow signals and directions conveyed by traffic safety facilities;

Nevertheless, at around 14:50 on June 9, 2015, the Defendant violated the signal indicating the traffic safety facilities, while driving the Crocketing car volume on the front of the National Museum of Korea, which is located in the 17th week-dong-dong-dong-dong, in front of the National Museum of Korea, even though the signal, etc. of the front bank was green signal, the Defendant violated the signal indicating the traffic safety facilities.

2. The driver of a vehicle who intends to make a U-turn at an intersection where traffic is controlled by the judgment signal apparatus and has a safety sign allowing a U-turn as a surface sign at the front of the intersection, but does not have a separate sign such as left-hand turn signal or walking signal internship, in the signal apparatus installed at the intersection at the front of the bank, and the driver of the vehicle who intends to make a U-turn at the same U-turn permitted zone shall be wholly amended by Act No. 7545, May 31, 2005;

(b) If it is not likely to obstruct the normal traffic of pedestrians, other vehicles and horses in accordance with the method of traffic under the provisions of Article 18(1) of the current Road Traffic Act, it may be an intern, and the signal apparatus on the front side must be changed to the left turn signal, not to make an internship.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2004Da29934 delivered on June 10, 2005). Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, including the statements made by the witness D in this court and the statements or images of the evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the paper numbers) in this court, the Defendant driven his own vehicle at the place as stated in the facts charged, and carried out a U.S. internship in the state of green light, such as the date and time as indicated in the facts charged, and the signal signals, etc. of the signal apparatus installed in the A.S. on the line with the U.S., the Defendant was installed with safety signs allowing U.S. internship. However, at the time when the Defendant carried out the U.S. internship.