logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.01.09 2018고단2141
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of Bsch Rexton vehicles.

On June 6, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 14:40, and proceeded to turn to D the front three lanes of the three-lane road at the intersection of Soyang-gu C Apartment-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul.

Since there is a left left turn sign, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering wheel, brakes and other devices of the vehicle, and by looking at the front side and left left side of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn left and proceeded to the left without neglecting the right at the front time, and the FOba of the victim E (E, 53 years old) driving, which is proceeding in accordance with the straight line in the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, was completely left ahead of the left-hand side of the Defendant’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim’s occupational negligence as above, resulting in the victim’s injury, such as the feleing of the body fele, accompanied by a non-feling felf (all parts) in need of treatment for about 16 weeks, resulting in the victim’s non-fele-feling.

2. Determination and conclusion of the instant facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and do not fall under any subparagraph of the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and thus, cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of

However, according to the records, the victim expressed his/her intention that he/she does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the defendant on December 29, 2018, which is after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow