The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving of CM5 automobiles.

On March 11, 2016, when the Defendant drives the said car as a business on March 11, 2016, and proceeds from the speed of approximately KRW 50.4km-58.3 km at the speed of about 50.3 km/58.3 km at the speed of the city according to the first one-lane from the Sung-dong-dong Sungdong-dong-ro to the Sungdong-dong-dong 224 Sungdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-ri, the Defendant was found to have received the part of the victim D (Y, 62 years old-dong-dong-dong-dong-ri-dong-ri-dong-dong-ri-dong-dong-dong-ri-dong-ri

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the risk of life or a fatal or incurable disease by causing bodily injury to the victim, such as an acute cerebral typosis, resulting in in an unidentified state by causing bodily injury to the victim due to such occupational negligence.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent in accordance with the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning

However, according to the written agreement, it is recognized that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on November 17, 2016 after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.