Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall assault the warden for liaison with an election in connection with the election.

On April 30, 2017, the Defendant was leading to the 19th presidential election implemented on May 9, 2017, and around April 30, 206:45, on the road in Busan Dong-gu C, the “D Failure” on the front of the election campaign by the victim G, etc., who is the head of the election liaison office for the F candidates of the E political party, and the “F is a false horse dispute.”

p. S. S. S. S. Mebace

The entire portion of why it continues to be false

H The test shall be asked as soon as possible. If so, whether the test is not pit

“The part of the victim’s body, which prevents the victim from passing sound, was pushed down several times with the Defendant’s chest and part of the part, and the victim’s chest was pushed down with the Defendant’s chest and part.

As above, Defendant assaulted the president with respect to the 19th presidential election.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a label of an election liaison, a photograph of a cell phone image photograph, and an investigation report (Evidence Nos. 2, 11)

1. Relevant laws and Article 237 (1) 1 of the Act on the Election of Public Officials in Charge of Criminal Facts and the elective Election of Punishment (Optional to a punishment);

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not set the sentencing criteria for the provisional payment order.

1. Scope of applicable sentences: Fines of 2.5 million won to 15 million won;

2. The crime of this case, which was sentenced, committed by the defendant, assaults the victim, who was the warden of the election liaison where the defendant was conducting an election campaign.

The Defendant committed the instant crime, thereby infringing on the freedom of election.

However, the Defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected his mistake.

The degree of assault committed by the defendant is relatively weak.

There is no record of a crime related to the same election, which has been sentenced to a fine or more severe punishment.