beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;
2. Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 4, 2015, at the office of Mapo-gu Seoul District Court C and office of 174 Seoul Western District Court around 09:40, the Defendant: (a) visited to peruse the documents of the provisional attachment case and opened the civil petition documents possessed by himself on the public computer in charge of provisional attachment without going through the reception counter; (b) changed by D who is a public official of the court; (c) walked three times due to the discovery of the strawbbling straws that were in front of the defect; and (d) E, a court C and an employee of the above court where the work was carried out on the side of the 2nd page, “Dh waste fish.”
In response to the Defendant’s resistance, the Defendant was holding the civil petition documents in the above E’s book, and “Neman”
2.2 66
Whether they are not different from others without permission.
내가 언제 쓰레기통을 찼느냐.
“Arbre” with sound for about 20 minutes, and threat the body to the above E for about 20 minutes, and the said E does not “abre.”
It is expected to be a part of the audit system.
“.........”
As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of court officials E by assault and intimidation.
2. The Defendant: at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and at the location where the Victim G, who is C and F, are in harmony with C and C, and the horses, court employees, and civil petitioners are located, “snickening” to the victim.
b) whether a public official is so smelled;
At the work place where they are to sit, whether they are to sit on this side or not.
“.........”
Then, even though the victim confirmed that he did not drink the alcohol, the above victim confirmed that he did not drink the alcohol, and the defendant confirmed that he did not drink the alcohol, the above victim continues to be "whether a public official drinks the alcohol."
Snishing sniff.
approximately four times repeatedly sound, “,” to the effect that it was “.”
Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.
Summary of Evidence
1..