1. As to the land of paragraphs 1 through 3, 5 through 11 as set out in the attached Table 1 list, that the Defendant was against the Plaintiff on May 4, 2016.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 14, 2006, Plaintiff A and B completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the lands listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 6, and completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the lands listed in the separate sheet No. 1/2, and completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the lands listed in paragraphs 3 and 5 on January 12, 2009.

In addition, Plaintiff C and D completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the lands listed in paragraphs 7 through 9 of the same list on January 9, 2015.

Plaintiff

E completed the registration of ownership transfer for the land listed in paragraph 10 of the same list on April 12, 1996, and completed the registration of ownership transfer for the land listed in paragraph 11 of the same list on February 23, 1980.

(hereinafter referred to as “the entire land of this case” in common, and when each land is referred to as “the entire land of this case,” it shall be specified as a bund, and in the case of “the land of this case” excluding F land, it shall be referred to as “the land of this case.”

The Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor, on March 4, 200, formulated a decision on the modification of the Ulsan Metropolitan City Planning (hereinafter referred to as the "decision of this case") on March 4, 200, announced as G G published in Ulsan Metropolitan City, and the land of this case is included in the urban planning facilities (public land) newly established by the decision of this case.

C. On April 28, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed an application with the Defendant for the cancellation of public vacant land on the entire land of this case (hereinafter “instant application”). On May 4, 2016, the Defendant sent a reply to the purport that it is difficult to cancel the public vacant land, since, after completing design services, the Defendant is promoting working design services for the development of public vacant land with respect to the entire land of this case as of May 4, 2016.

(hereinafter referred to as "the Disposition in this case"). / [Grounds for recognition] The Disposition in this case is without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 9, Eul evidence 2, and 4 (including the number, hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The case.