logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.12.02 2016고합254
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

A user on an emergency warning (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 9, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 2 years and 6 months, and on February 20, 2009, with prison labor for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Daejeon District Court.

In addition, on June 15, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) (thief) in the Busan District Court's Vice Branch branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 9, 2016.

On July 8, 2016, the Defendant filed a petition for a new trial on the judgment subject to a retrial, and was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) with the Incheon District Court’s Branch Branch, etc.,

(hereinafter “Final Judgment on Review”). [The Defendant, who committed a crime, committed a crime by intrusion upon a house without a locking door, etc., committed a crime with intent to commit a crime by return to the Suwon City, Seoan City, Sejong City, Sejong si, Pyeongtaek si, etc. to prevent arrest of the investigation agency.

On April 25, 2016, at around 12:00, the Defendant opened a gate and window that were not temporarily set up in the victim’s detached house in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and stolen it by holding 14k gold 14k in total amount equivalent to the market price of 433,000 won, one, 14k gold tamp, one, 14k gold tamp, and 14k gold tamp.

In addition, from that time to August 13:00 on August 9, 2016, the Defendant stated 61,020,000 won in the indictment of this case in total of 16 times in total as shown in the attached list of crimes, which is clearly written in writing, but it is obvious that this is a clerical error, and thus, it shall be corrected ex officio.

considerable amount of property was stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. Each E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, and N.

arrow