logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.15 2015가단5320827
용역비
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff MMMMMM (hereinafter “Plaintiff MMMM”) is a company that engages in the development of software, etc., and Plaintiff MMMMMM corporation (hereinafter “Plaintiff MMMMM”) is a company that engages in the manufacture of software package and the development of software.

B. Around 2014, the Plaintiffs agreed to jointly supply and demand the Plaintiff’s shares in the “2014 Research Site XML original construction project” that the Defendant ordered: (a) the Plaintiff’s share of 60%; (b) the Plaintiff’s Republic of Korea was 40%; and (c) the Plaintiff’s representative was the Plaintiff’s IMM community.

C. On December 24, 2014, Plaintiff M200 entered into a service contract with the Defendant to perform the project as a representative of the said joint contractor. The main contents of the service contract (Evidence A 3) are as follows.

(hereinafter) The above service business "the instant service business", the above service contract "the instant service contract", and the above service contract "the service contract "the instant service contract"): The defendant (the purchasing business entity under the jurisdiction of the Public Procurement Service): The plaintiff IMM community contract company and the equity ratio: plaintiff 60% of the plaintiff IMM community contract company and the plaintiff NAS 40% of the above service contract: the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention established under the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

(1) Contract title: A contract amount for the establishment of a research paper XML original in 2014: 271,000,000 won: A contract period for the direct delivery: An inspection agency on April 23, 2015: A procuring entity (the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: hereinafter referred to as the "Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention"): A procuring entity (the Director for Disease Control and Prevention

D. On December 16, 2014 and December 19, 2014, the Plaintiffs consulted with the Director General of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about the human resources and the location of a workplace to participate in the instant service and the location of a workplace, etc., and submitted a plan to initiate the instant service and to conduct the instant service to the Director General of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on January 5, 2015.

E. The defendant of this case.

arrow