A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who served as a design office at C architect office located in the racing from around 2002 to around 2017.

1. Fraud;

A. On July 2015, the Defendant against the victim D may obtain a construction design and construction permit from the victim’s house located in North Korea-gu E at Port, Posi-si, Posi-si, Posi, Posi-si, Posi, Posi-si, Posi, in relation to the F farm housing construction works in North Korea-gu, Posi-si, Posi-si.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant received the above money, he did not think that he would receive the building permit on behalf of the defendant who did not have a certified architect qualification by designing the building on his own, and did not think that he had the certified architect receive the building permit on his behalf after having the architect design.

Nevertheless, on July 21, 2015, the Defendant was transferred KRW 2 million to the Agricultural Cooperative G account in the name of the Defendant, as the expenses for construction design and construction permission agency for around July 21, 2015.

Then, on April 24, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement that “The balance of the design cost and the construction permit agency cost is different” while working as if the Plaintiff completed the construction design normally and the construction permit was granted.

However, the Defendant, on October 2015, renounced the application for a building permit by the public official in charge of the office in North Korea at the port in the port, due to the error in the construction design prepared by the Defendant, and did not normally proceed with the construction design and the construction permit by proxy. Nevertheless, on December 9, 2015, the Defendant issued the victim a letter of building permit under the name of the head of the office in North Korea-Gu Office at port, which the Defendant forged, and had the victim start the construction work from September 2016, and there was no intention or ability to obtain the building permit any longer.

Nevertheless, on April 24, 2017, the defendant is responsible for the cost of construction design and construction permission for the victim.