logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.05.30 2018가합27380
집행판결
Text

1. As to paragraph 1, the Seoul High Court Decision 2016Ra143 (hereinafter “Seoul High Court”) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Seoul Northern District Court rendered on August 29, 2014 that, in the case of a preliminary injunction against the Defendant against the Defendant, “The Seoul Northern District Court shall suspend the Plaintiff’s exercise of duties as the Plaintiff’s representative (a delegated title, a fence, and the chairman of the party branch) and shall not use the Plaintiff’s representative (a delegated title, a fence, and a chairman) until the final and conclusive judgment of the claim case, such as the confirmation of invalidity of the joint council resolution by Seoul Central District Court 2014Kahap59064, the Seoul Northern District Court rendered on August 29, 2014” (the Seoul Northern Northern District Court 2014Kahap2065, hereinafter “instant provisional injunction”).

(2) The Defendant filed an objection against provisional disposition as Seoul Northern District Court 2014Kahap20185, but the above court approved the provisional disposition order of this case on December 5, 2014, and the appeal was dismissed, and the provisional disposition order of this case became final and conclusive.

B. On September 11, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an indirect compulsory enforcement against the Defendant based on the instant provisional disposition order against the Defendant. 2) The Seoul Northern District Court accepted most of the Plaintiff’s applications on March 4, 2016 (Seoul Northern District Court DD, the said decision was served on the Defendant on March 9, 2016). The Defendant appealed against the Seoul Northern District Court, and the Seoul High Court partially modified the first instance court’s decision on September 20, 2016, thereby making a decision of indirect compulsory enforcement as follows.

(Seoul High Court Order 2016Ra143, hereinafter referred to as "the decision of indirect compulsory performance of this case") 1. A.

The debtor (the defendant, hereinafter the same shall apply) has the creditor (the plaintiff, hereinafter the same shall apply) (the plaintiff, hereinafter the same shall apply) from the date of receiving the decision of the first instance until the judgment of the case of the claim, such as the confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of the Joint Council by the Seoul Central District Court

(ii) indicate the debtor as the representative of the creditor (a delegating pastor, a holding officer, or the president of the party) on his/her website or on its website, or submit to the A Religious Organization Assembly (integrated) and the A Religious Organization Em Union Assembly.

arrow