(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.05.29 2015가단7627

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.05.29 2015가단7627

전세보증금반환

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

In full view of the facts without dispute, Eul's entries and the overall purport of the arguments, the defendant (Appointed Party) B and the Appointed C (hereinafter referred to as "the defendant (Appointed Party B and the Appointed Party C") are "the plaintiff on September 2, 2003, and the defendants are "Seoul Songpa-gu No. 102 et al. (102 et al.)" owned by the defendants against the plaintiff on September 2, 2003.

A lease contract was entered into between B, B, 45 million won, and the term of lease from September 2, 2003 to September 1, 2005, and the lease deposit was received at that time and delivered to the Plaintiff (102). The Plaintiff can recognize the fact that the Plaintiff returned 102 to the Defendants after the said term of lease expires.

Judgment

A. According to the above facts, as long as the above lease agreement has expired, the Defendants, a joint lessee, are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 30 million, as claimed by the Plaintiff, as long as the above lease agreement has expired, barring any special circumstance.

B. The Defendants asserted that the full amount of the lease deposit was refunded at the time of the above delivery.

The Plaintiff received KRW 45 million from the Defendants on September 23, 2006, based on the full purport of the statement and the entire argument of the Plaintiff’s signature: (a) the Plaintiff received KRW 45 million from the Defendants on September 23, 2006, taking account of the following: (b) the Plaintiff’s signature and the Plaintiff’s signature and the Plaintiff’s signature are not a dispute between the parties

The Plaintiff and the Defendants, at the time of entering into the said lease agreement, shall make payments under the verification of the Lessee Co., Ltd. E representative director F at the time of returning the lease deposit.

The special contract of "B" (B) was entered into in the Special Agreement, and the above receipt (B) is that "I will pay to the plaintiff KRW 45 million, but I will not pay it under the confirmation of F at the request of the plaintiff who is the lessee.

(in the absence of representative director).

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2017.01.10 2016가단14345

-서울남부지방법원 2019.05.21 2018가단19112

-수원지방법원성남지원 2016.05.26 2015가합201974

-전주지방법원군산지원 2016.01.28 2015가합931

-서울북부지방법원 2015.06.03 2015가합20456