logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2020.09.03 2020고단265
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act, no person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall lend a means of access while requesting or promising to provide or receive any compensation;

Nevertheless, around October 2019, the Defendant listened to the statement that “When sending a physical card with good credit because it is not good, the Defendant would have extended credit by securing performance,” and around October 14, 2019, at the large-party 1 post office located in the Daegu Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 58, one copy of the physical card connected to the D Association account (E) under the name of the Defendant, and issued one copy of the card to the person who was not the name of the Defendant, and notified the password.

As a result, the Defendant promised to provide a means of access in return for an intangible expected profit to receive future loans, and lent it to a person who is named in bad faith.

2. No person who violates the Telecommunications Business Act may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide such services for communications;

Nevertheless, around October 16, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from an infinite person who assumes the contact leader C of the B Office B office; (b) that “a loan product released by a telecommunications company and FF finance entered into an alliance agreement; (c) can be loaned up to a maximum of three million won per single line if it is sent via a opening of the mobile phone; (d) opened the mobile phone “G” under the Defendant’s name on the 22th day of the same month; and (e) delivered the said mobile phone to an infinite person on his/her name at the 1-dong post office located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-ro, Daegu-ro 58.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for another's communications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of the police statement of H (verification of the opening phone call in the name of A), a statement of investigation (D Association), a financial information meeting (D Association), and a Kakakao dialogue.

arrow