logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.06.12 2014나2659
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim extended in the trial are all dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal are filed.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s father P, one of his father and father, completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of the instant real estate on March 9, 1965 Q and R, one-half shares, respectively, and Q and R completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of the instant real estate. Q and R completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of the said co-ownership shares on the ground of sale on June 12, 1987, No. 12028, Jun. 9, 1987, with the Plaintiff andO on each of the said co-ownership.

B. On May 3, 1993, theO died on the deceased on May 3, 1993. Around 1949, the deceased’s spouse S also succeeded jointly to the property of the networkO by B, C, D, K, L, M, and N, children of the network. Of the real estate Nos. 1 and 3 in the separate sheet, the transfer registration of shares was completed on February 4, 2011 due to inheritance by agreement and division in the D future.

C. However, D died on December 1, 2013 while the instant lawsuit was pending, and the Defendant, as the deceased’s spouse, is F, G, H, I, and J as well as the deceased’s co-inheritors.

Meanwhile, as to the network D shares of real estate Nos. 1 and 3 as indicated in the separate sheet, the Chuncheon District Court received on December 27, 2013 as the receipt of No. 63360 on Dec. 27, 2013, the transfer registration for shares arising from inheritance due to the future division was completed. As to the network shares of real estate No. 2 as indicated in the separate sheet, the transfer registration for shares arising from the inheritance due to the future division was completed on January 17, 2014, as the receipt of No. 2698 of Jan. 17, 2014. The 1/2 shares of each of the instant real estate owned by the networkO are currently

【Ground for recognition” without any dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 through 3, Gap evidence 2-1 through 3, Gap evidence 3-5 and Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 3-1 through 3-3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that each of the instant real estate was originally donated to the Plaintiff by the Plaintiff’s father P, and was actually owned by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff’s registration of ownership transfer is completed by Q and R.

arrow