1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Each land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 was completed on April 30, 1979 on April 30, 1979.

However, in the G on May 15, 2007, the registration of ownership transfer was completed as the receipt of the Chuncheon District Court No. 22842 on the grounds of inheritance due to the division of agreement as of February 12, 2007, and on June 25, 2012, the registration of ownership transfer was completed as of June 21, 2012 by the receipt of the Chuncheon District Court as of June 30548.

B. On April 30, 1979, the land listed in the Attachment No. 2 List was completed on April 30, 1979.

However, in the G on May 15, 2007, the registration of ownership transfer was completed as the receipt of the Chuncheon District Court No. 22842 on the grounds of inheritance due to the split-off on February 12, 2007, and on June 25, 2012, the registration of ownership transfer was completed as the receipt of the Chuncheon District Court No. 30549 on June 21, 2012.

C. The F died on February 12, 2007, and the Plaintiff B, H, I, and G, who is the spouse, succeeded to the property.

After that, G died on November 20, 2012, and as his/her property heir, there are Defendant C, Defendant D and E, who is his/her spouse.

On the other hand, I died on February 19, 2016 and succeeded to the property of the Plaintiff A.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including provisional number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The Plaintiffs’ assertion is invalid in the scope exceeding 2/11 of the inheritance shares of G even though G did not have any divided agreement with respect to each of the lands listed in the separate sheet No. 1 and the land listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”), and the ownership transfer registration that was completed to be solely inherited in the future of G is invalid within the scope exceeding 2/11 of the inheritance shares of G. As such, Defendant C and D’s transfer registration that was based on the claim is invalid within the said scope, the Defendants are in the name of net G with respect to each of the instant real estate to the extent exceeding 2/