1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

(a) Plaintiff’s entry into the Republic of Korea and application for recognition of refugee - Entry: Egypt - Entry into the Republic of Korea on March 23, 2016 (Status B2): Application for recognition of refugee status: November 16, 2017

B. Defendant’s decision on the recognition of refugee status as of September 23, 2019 (hereinafter “instant disposition”): The ground for recognition does not constitute “a well-founded fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Refugee Convention and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da1548, Sept. 23, 2019); the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion was made as a Islamic believers, who changed the species from hydrospa to Espathic, and was threatened by Espathic spathic spathics.

In the event that the plaintiff returned to Egypt, there is sufficient risk of threat to life, which constitutes a reasonable fear.

Therefore, the instant disposition is unlawful.

B. In full view of the provisions of Article 2 subparag. 1 and Article 18 of the Refugee Act, Article 1 of the Refugee Convention, and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol, foreigners who, owing to well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, are unable or do not want the protection of the country of nationality, or who, owing to such fear, cannot return to the country in which they were living in the Republic of Korea before entering the Republic of Korea, or who, owing to such fear, do not want to return to the country in which they were living in the Republic of Korea, shall be recognized as a refugee, and gambling satisfying the requirements for recognition of a refugee refers to any act causing serious infringement of, or discrimination against, fundamental human dignity, including threats to life, body, or freedom, and any foreigner applying for recognition of a refugee shall prove that there is a well

(See Supreme Court Decision 2012Du14378 Decided April 25, 2013). The entry of evidence No. 4 is recognized by comprehensively considering the purport of the entire pleadings.