The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the victims of the instant crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary measures after the accident) do not want the punishment of the defendant. Meanwhile, the defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the suspended execution period due to the Defendant's violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving), and the defendant escaped without taking any measures to cause a traffic accident while driving a driver without a license, and the defendant also abetted the victim to avoid a traffic accident in order to conceal his/her driving. As such, the punishment equivalent to the heavier criminal liability is inevitable, taking into account the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., as the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.