logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1963. 10. 31. 선고 63다487 판결
[토지인도등][집11(2)민,216]
Main Issues

The validity of an unregistered disposition that has not been made without making a registration of attribution of unregistered household under the name of the State.

Summary of Judgment

Even if the unregistered household house was disposed of without making the ownership registration under the name of the State, it cannot be deemed null and void even if it was disposed of without making the ownership registration.

Plaintiff-Appellee

Mayang-gu, a foundation

Defendant-Appellant

Kim Yong-woo

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju District Court Decision 62Na358 delivered on June 19, 1963

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

According to the original judgment as to the defendant's ground of appeal, the court below found that the plaintiff had no ownership transfer registration under the above 5,6 and 7's name and the result of verification on the house ledger of the above 5,00 won and the above 2,000 won of the above 19,000 won of the Mining Group 55,00 won of the non-registered house under the name of the defendant's 19,000 won of the 19,000 won of the 19,000 won of the 5,000 won of the 195,000 won of the 19,000 won of the 19,000 won of the 19,000 won of the 5,000 won of the 19,000,000 won of the above 2,000 won of the above 1,000 won of the 195,000,000 won of the above 15,015,0.

Justices Lee Woo-won (Presiding Justice) and Lee Ho-won (Presiding Justice)

arrow