1. The defendant (Appointeds) and the appointed parties D shall be jointly and severally selected to the plaintiffs in KRW 250,000,000 and the designated parties.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs lent KRW 240,000,000 to Defendant (Appointed Party) and Appointed (hereinafter “Defendants”) around 1998, and KRW 70,000,000,000 around 199, including KRW 199,000,000 around 200,000, and around 2003. Upon the Plaintiffs’ request for the repayment of loans, the Defendants issued and delivered a promissory note (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) as of April 25, 2012 with a face value of KRW 250,00,000,000, and the due date for payment as of April 25, 2012.

(E) No. 316 No. 316 No. 2003.B.

The plaintiffs and the defendants were operated in the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan City market, respectively (the plaintiff's trade name F, the defendants' trade name G), and there was a trade name from April 25, 2003 to H with a quantity of six months.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants are obligated to pay the Plaintiffs damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from the day following the delivery date of the copy of the instant complaint (Defendant D shall be November 12, 2015; Defendant C shall be January 2016) to the day of full payment to the day of full payment, as the Plaintiff seeks.

(The statutory interest rate under the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings is reduced to 15% per annum from October 1, 2015, and thus, the portion of the claim for damages for delay exceeding 15% per annum is dismissed).

(1) The defendants and the defendants are loans of this case in the course of settling a partnership relationship after six months from the time they entered into a partnership agreement and run their businesses on April 25, 2003.