logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.07.05 2015가단106905
건물명도
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties E, respectively, as to KRW 3,819,410 and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 11, 2002, the Grand decoration Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Sami Construction”) purchased the instant land for the purpose of constructing a tenement house on the ground of the Cheongju-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F. 1,164.7 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed E (hereinafter the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed Party E (hereinafter the Plaintiff and the Appointed Party E, collectively referred to as the “Plaintiffs”). The instant land was purchased for the purpose of constructing a tenement house on the ground of the Cheongju-gu Special Metropolitan City F. 1,164.7 square meters (hereinafter

B. After that, on August 4, 2003, Daehun Construction delegated all rights to the Newly constructed row housing in question to G, and G again delegated all rights related to the Newly constructed construction to H, etc.

C. On March 23, 2004, H et al. established Company I and completed the new construction of the above apartment house on August 2004, but it was impossible to pay the purchase and sale balance to the Plaintiffs. On August 4, 2004, H et al. agreed to determine the land price to be paid by H et al. to the Plaintiff as KRW 389 million between the Plaintiffs and the Plaintiffs, and if the said money is not paid until December 30, 2004, three tenement houses, including real estate in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”), are owned by the Plaintiffs as payment in kind.

Pursuant to the above agreement between the plaintiffs and H, the plaintiffs completed registration of preservation of ownership as to the real estate of this case as Cheongju District Court No. 66094 on September 13, 2004.

(1/2 of each of the plaintiffs' equity interests). (e)

Since H et al. failed to pay the agreed balance in various construction-related lawsuits, such as construction cost and personnel expenses, among building construction and G, the Plaintiffs are obligated to prove the content of the liquidation amount by the method of settlement of attribution, in accordance with the Provisional Registration Security Act, for liquidation through the method of settlement of attribution.

arrow