logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.03.06 2017누85797
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following matters, and thus, it shall be accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added to the 3rd page 9 of the judgment of the first instance.

(A) Although the Plaintiff asserts that it is difficult to expect the protection of public authority against its citizens because the weak state index is very high, according to the statement of Gap evidence 6, it can be recognized that it is a country with a high vulnerable state index, but such circumstance alone is insufficient to recognize that it is difficult to expect the protection of the judicial institution, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that it is difficult to expect the protection of the plaintiff).

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow