1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The plaintiff's main ground for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the plaintiff's argument in the court of first instance, and it is acceptable to accept the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance, even though the plaintiff's main ground for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not different from the plaintiff's argument in the court of first instance, and each statement of evidence No.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for a partial dismissal as follows. Thus, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff, in the second fourth page of the first instance judgment, shall add “in the first instance judgment,” “in the first instance judgment,” and shall add “(i)” to “the ginseng dry field” next.

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as the "lease") of the 6th part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written.

The second to nine parallels in the first instance judgment (hereinafter referred to as “H”) were deleted from “H association” to “H”.

Between the 14th and 15th of the first instance judgment, the first instance judgment added “the Plaintiff obtained a loan of KRW 129,100,000 from the H association (hereinafter referred to as “H”) in reserve for cultivation expenses, and paid it to the deceased C as the cultivation expenses. The Plaintiff shall claim for the return of KRW 129,100,000 to the Defendant who constituted the deceased and the cooperative for the operation of the ginseng business.”

"2. Judgment" at the second bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to "2. Judgment on the primary claim".

After the third 7th 7th Sheet of the judgment of the first instance, the statement “A” 1 through 5, 8 through 10 (including paper numbers) and each fact-finding with respect to H union presidents of this court shall be deleted.

The third 9,374,688 won (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s transfer”) in the 10th 9, 10th 9 and 10th 19,00 won (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s transfer”) were transferred to the Deceased, including a total transfer of KRW 9,374,68 (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s transfer”).