1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 10,000,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Plaintiff’s counterclaim from August 17, 2016 to February 21, 2018.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person working as the director of C Committee, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant have sold part of the D Buildings around October 2015 and occupied and resided around August 2016.

나. 원고와 피고는 서로 모르는 사이였는데, 피고가 2016. 3.경부터 2016. 7.경까지 예비입주자협의회 대표를 맡아 활동하였기에 서로 온라인상 입주자 카페를 통해 의견을 나눴다.

C. On March 31, 2016, at the sales office of the D Building, a notice was sent to prospective occupants on a change in the household, Daminho Lake, and the dwelling space, and the Plaintiff did not raise any objection to the change in the rail and hold, but the Plaintiff asserted that the change in the construction work for the purpose of cost reduction is arbitrarily changed and the other prospective occupants did not raise any objection.

On July 3, 2016, the Plaintiff pointed out the issue of defective construction of outer walls in an occupant car page, and posted a photograph showing a motor vehicle key on the outer wall of one house, and explained that the Plaintiff’s construction defect is sufficient to enter even if the Plaintiff’s inner wall was subdivided into the key of the motor vehicle. However, Nonparty E, an occupant, was not the Plaintiff’s ownership of the above photograph, but the Plaintiff’s house owned by another occupant, and the Plaintiff’s house was its own house, and Nonparty F, who appears to be the owner of the above house, destroyed the property without his own permission. The Plaintiff also posted a letter to the effect that the Plaintiff’s act constitutes defamation or defamation, regardless of the fact that Nonparty F was written by F.

E. Since July 24, 2016, the Defendant is called “G” in front of the school where the Plaintiff’s child attends as an external area of the said housing complex.