1. Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, K, K, L, M, M, N,O, P, R, S, T, U,V, X, Y, Z, AB, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, F, or AF of the first instance judgment.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of building, remodeling, repairing, and selling ships. The Defendants are executive officers in the “position (2012)” list of the claim amount by Defendant 2 at the time of 2012, as indicated in each position.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendants set the management goal to be achieved by the Defendants, an executive officer, and set up a management contract in order to determine matters concerning the objective management and evaluation, etc., and the management contract states that “B means the Plaintiff.” The Defendants refer to the Defendants. The payment of piece rates based on the previous year’s performance, and the payment period and payment method shall be separately determined.” 2) The Plaintiff entered into an MOU with the Korea Development Bank (hereinafter “Industrial Bank”) which is the Plaintiff’s major shareholder, and the Industrial Bank made management evaluation of the Plaintiff in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in the MOU, and notified the result, the Plaintiff paid piece rates to executive officers in accordance with the MOU evaluation standard as follows.

Class A C Grade D E F Grade G G, between 95 and 95-90 to 85-85-80 to 75-70 70, 100% payment rate below 10% 90% 80% 70% 50% 50% management evaluation in 2012 of the Plaintiff, and the Industrial Bank grants 70.91 points at ordinary point. On May 7, 2013, 2013, the Plaintiff paid to the Defendants each money indicated in the “performance-based payment amount” column in the Defendant’s claim amount table corresponding to the F grade (50% of the performance-based payment rate) among the above MOU evaluation criteria. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute over the facts, Gap, 2, and 4 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Judgment on the ground of the Plaintiff’s claim

A. The intent of the Plaintiff’s assertion is to determine detailed matters concerning piece rates that the Plaintiff shall pay to executives.