1. The Plaintiffs’ lawsuit against Defendant F was concluded on November 13, 2014 as deeming the withdrawal of Defendant F’s appeal.

2...

1. The summary of the case and the facts premised on the case

A. The summary of the instant case is the case where the Plaintiffs have claims for loans, etc. by lending funds to Defendant E or supplying goods, and Defendant E claims for the return of loans, etc. against Defendant E by asserting that the act of selling real estate owned by Defendant E to Defendant F constituted a fraudulent act, and in order to preserve the return, Defendant F seeks for the cancellation of a sales contract, which is a fraudulent act, and the implementation of the procedure for the registration of cancellation of transfer of ownership,

The judgment of the first instance is accepted by the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant Eul and D, and the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant Eul, excluding part of the plaintiff's incidental claims against the defendant Eul, and dismissed the rest of the plaintiff's claims against the defendant Eul. The defendants appealed against the part against which they lost.

(B) In this court, Plaintiff B has partially reduced the claim of Defendant E.

【Evidence of Facts 【Evidence’ 1-7, A8-1, 2, A9-1, 2, and 10-1 through 11, A1, 12, 19, A20-1, 2, A23-1, 2, A24, A25-1, A25-2, A26, A26, A26, 1, 4, 6, 10-1, 2, 10-2, and witness AD and pleadings. (i) The Plaintiff is a person who operated the G that supplies construction materials and hardware, and the Plaintiff D is a person who operates G.

Defendant E is a person who runs a construction business under the trade name of H, and Defendant F is a female student of Defendant E.

⑵ 원고 A의 피고 E에 대한 자금대여 ㈎ 원고 A은 2010. 9. 9. 형사사건으로 구속되어 기소된 피고 E의 형사사건 변호를 맡은 법무법인에 변호사 수임료로 2,000만 원을 송금하는 방법으로, 2011. 11. 15. 법무법인에 보석보증금으로 1,000만 원을 건네주는 방법으로 피고 E에게 합계 3,000만 원을 이자와 변제기를 정하지 않고 대여하였다.

㈏ 원고 A은...