The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The summary of the case and the facts premised on the case

A. The summary of the instant case pertains to a collection lawsuit seeking the payment of the construction cost (118,89,831 won) and its delay damages against the Defendant, a third party obligor, by asserting that the Plaintiff received a claim for the rent of building materials based on the order of payment finalized against B (the former trade name A; hereinafter “A”), as a claim for the rent of building materials based on the order of payment finalized against B (the former trade name A; hereinafter “A”).

The judgment of the first instance dismissed the plaintiff's claim on the ground that there is no claim for construction cost against the defendant A, who is the object of the seizure and collection order, and the plaintiff appealed against this.

B. On the premise, 【Evidence” 1, 2, 3, 19, 4, and 7, and the purport of the entire pleadings (i) The Plaintiff is a company with the purpose of leasing temporary materials used at construction sites to a construction company. The Defendant is a company with the purpose of civil engineering and construction, housing construction, etc., and A is a soil construction business and reinforced concrete construction business.

⑵ 피고와 A 사이의 건설공사 하도급계약과 하도급계약 중간종료 ㈎ 피고는 2011. 5. 3. A과 사이에 서울 중구 C 일대 도시형생활주택 신축공사 중 철근콘크리트공사(이하, ‘C 공사’라 한다)를 공사대금1,367,135,292원, 공사기간 2011. 5. 3.부터 2012. 4. 30.까지로 정하여 도급하기로 하는 내용의 건설공사 하도급계약을 체결하였고, 이에 따라 A이 그 무렵 하도급받은 공사에 착공하였다.

㈏ 피고와 A은 2011. 7. 29. C 공사에 관하여 A의 경영상태 악화를 이유로 계약금액을 240,608,480원(1,126,526,812원 감소), 공사기간을 2011. 5. 3.부터 2011. 7. 29.까지로 변경하여 중간에 종료하기로 약정하였다.

【Plaintiff’s seizure and collection order against A’s executory payment order is Seoul Eastern District Court.