Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 6, 2016, the Defendant, at around 22:50, called Suwon-si E apartment units 308 dong 302, called the victim F (56 years of age) to leave the door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door to the victim's face face coming from the door door door door door door door door door, and then, the victim's face door door door door door door door door

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Partial statement of the witness F;

1. F's photographic photo of damaged part of the F;

1. A report on investigation (on-site CCTV verification), a report on investigation (CCTV analysis - 2j), and a report on investigation (Submission of a written diagnosis of the suspect's injury);

1. Application of a video CD-related statute;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are the cases of assault by both the Defendant and the victim. In full view of the following, the part not guilty: (a) the circumstance and contents of the dispute in the instant case; (b) the degree of injury; and (c) the Defendant’s primary offender who has no record of criminal punishment.

1. The summary of the facts charged was the date and time of the crime as indicated in the judgment, and at the place of the crime, the Defendant laid down the victim’s breath to the bottom and laid down the victim’s spellet, which requires treatment for about 56 days.

2. In the investigation process, the Defendant asserted that there was no injury in the victim’s breath by breathing breaths, as indicated in this part of the facts charged, and denied this part of the facts charged.

On the other hand, there are the victim's investigative process and some statements and reports of injury in this court as evidence that seems to correspond to this part of the facts charged.

However, the following circumstances are revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the defendant's delivery at the late time before the victim's house.