Plaintiff 1 and five others (Law Firm National Law Firm, Attorney Choi Gyeong-tae, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Head of Seocho Tax Office

January 20, 2011

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2010Guhap16103 decided August 27, 2010

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of KRW 2,630,538,620 on February 1, 2004 against the Plaintiffs on May 14, 2007 is revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

The reason for the judgment of the first instance is reasonable, and therefore, it is cited as the reason for this judgment in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Park Poe-dae (Presiding Judge) Lee Jae-hoon