logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.05.02 2017가단224498
사용료 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant amounting to KRW 71 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from November 1, 2017 to May 2, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s attached network D (hereinafter “the network”) is a person who has engaged in tent equipment, office supplies wholesale retail and rental business under the trade name of E, and the Defendant is a corporation that engages in advertising, event planning, etc.

B. The Deceased traded equipment, etc. to the Defendant from May 2006 to October 201, 201, and discontinued the transaction of the outstanding amount exceeding KRW 70 million (hereinafter “instant outstanding amount”). The Deceased traded with the Defendant again on the second half of 2015 and received the payment for the second half of 2015.

C. The Deceased repeatedly urged the Defendant to pay the outstanding amount of this case. The Defendant sent to the Deceased a reply stating that, around October 31, 2014, the Defendant’s continuous demand for the payment of the outstanding amount was due and that, around November 18, 2014, the Deceased sent to the Deceased a reply stating that “I will not get a telephone during the meeting,” and that “I will have a telephone next to the demand of the Deceased who requested the payment of the outstanding amount of this case with a specific amount of KRW 71 million, including the demand of the Deceased who requested the payment of the outstanding amount of this case.”

On April 22, 2016, in order to resolve the outstanding amount of this case before the death of the deceased after receiving the judgment of the end of the amam, the deceased contact with the defendant again on April 22, 2016, but he did not receive the phone during the meeting from the defendant," and lastly, he talks with the defendant about the date of "the head of the office is good that the head of the office is inside his body, and we cannot look at the plaintiff." The amount of the outstanding amount has been promised until this end, and even if we want to do so, it is my own request, and even if we do not know it, it is the first request to do so."

arrow