The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant committed the same kind of crime on April 30, 2013 before he/she was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment due to habitual fraud on October 24, 2012, which was committed by the victim DNA,O, M, L, and T in the investigation stage, and that the sum of the amount of the damage caused by deception was not much 43,440 won, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case was committed by the victim DNA, G, J, and T in the investigation stage, but the defendant was found to have been sentenced to eight months of punishment due to habitual fraud, etc. on the part of the victim DNA, G, J, and T. The defendant started to commit the crime of this case before the lapse of one month after the execution of the sentence was completed. Each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant nine times habitually without the victim's intent or ability to pay the drinking value habitually, and was not likely to interfere with business affairs on four occasions, and the defendant's motive and reason for the crime of this case are extremely identical.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.