The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, due to the summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of the facts of the crime; (b) the Defendant committed the larceny by intrusion into the center for older persons who did not live in a normal life; and (c) the Defendant stolen the article by scambling it; and (b) even though the Defendant was sentenced three times to a fine twice due to the violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act, it is recognized that the amount of damage was a small amount of money equivalent to KRW 294,00; (c) the Defendant scambling it; (d) the Defendant was sentenced three times due to the violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act; (e) the Defendant’s attitude was serious; (e) was not agreed with the victim of the crime of larceny and entering a structure; (e) the lower court appears to have determined the punishment by taking into account all favorable circumstances favorable to the Defendant; and (e) there was no special change in the trial; and (e) other circumstances that led to the Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct; and (e) the circumstances leading to the instant crime and the sentencing after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.