1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court is as follows: (a) the fact of recognition and the occurrence of liability for damages is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) the same is cited by the main sentence of Article 420

2. The amount of damages caused by the instant accident to the extent of liability for damages is as follows, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, in principle, and the current value of the damages at the time of the accident shall be calculated at the rate of 5/12 per annum.

It seems to be rejected that the parties' arguments have not been presented separately.

[Reasons for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap 3 through 13 evidence, Eul 1, 3, 8, 11 evidence (which include a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

3) Each description, the first instance court's commission of physical examination of the director of the I Hospital (except for part concerning the neary disorder) and the fact inquiry result, the result of this court's commission of physical examination of the director of the KI Hospital, the result of this court's fact inquiry about the director of the GI Hospital, the obvious fact to this court, the rule of experience, and the purport of the entire argument)

A. Basic Matters 1) Date of birth, gender: The date of birth of Jin and male 2: The age of the accident: 88 years: 4) the life expectancy of the Plaintiff at the time of the accident: the life expectancy and the life expectancy of the Plaintiff at the end of the life expectancy are expected to be reduced to 65% of the life expectancy of the Plaintiff at the court of first instance as of January 3, 2022. In this court, where the Plaintiff’s life expectancys at the time of the accident, the number of the Plaintiff’s life expectancys at the time was reduced to 64-74% of the average male’s age as of the date of the accident, and the number of the Plaintiff’s life expectancys at the age of 61 or more is anticipated to be reduced to 64-74% of the average male age as of the Plaintiff, and in the case of the Plaintiff, the number of the Plaintiff is anticipated to be reduced to 70% of the interim value.

In the case of "N on July 3, 2019," the N of the appraisal is equivalent to 65% of the average adult female's name on the basis of the present age.