1. Defendant A and C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000.

2. When Defendant A or C does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the chief of the Nowon-gu Chapter who is dismissed as a researcher at the M Research Institute L in Daejeon-gu, and Defendant B is the chief of the Trade Union and Publicity Bureau of the above Research Institute. Defendant C is the employee of the above Research Institute; Defendant D is the chief of the Trade Union and Accounting Bureau of the above Research Institute; Defendant E is the employee of the above Research Institute; Defendant E is the employee of the above Research Institute; Defendant F and Defendant G is the same employee of the above Research Institute; Defendant F and N are the researchers of the above Research Institute; and the Defendants are the researchers of the above Research Institute.

The Defendants dismissed Defendant A and Defendant B from office below the evaluation score, and thereafter, there was a complaint from the Regional Labor Relations Commission about the fact that the Defendants were not reinstated, such as requesting a reexamination from the National Labor Relations Commission even though there was a recommendation for reinstatement, and the above contents were used, and the above contents were put in place within the research institute, and the public relations error was eventually recovered by O et al.

1. Defendants A, B, C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Defendant G (Obstruction of Business) are 18. The written indictment on June 12, 2014, but it is obvious that the written indictment is a clerical error in 12.

At around 10:00, the management of the research institute was interfered with by force, such as interfering with the normal meeting of the victim, by putting the above office over 30 minutes on the place where the victim or other employees are located, stating that the victim's or other employees have stolen the diskettes without permission, on the ground that they were returned the diskettes recovered to the victim'sO.

2. The Defendants A, B, C, and D (Interference with their business) are distorted on the grounds that they would return promotional items other than diskettes to the victim’sO or other employees at the same place as the above 11:15 on June 24, 2014.