Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. In the course of the disposition, on June 14, 2016, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea with the Plaintiff’s nationality, the short-term sojourn status (C-3) refugee status application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) as of June 23, 2016, the date of the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) and on July 19, 2016: The fact that there is no dispute over the determination of rejection of the decision of December 22, 2016 as of the date of the application for objection that there is no sufficient ground for recognition of refugee status: the fact that there is no ground for recognition of rejection of the decision of the decision of December 22, 2016, Gap’s evidence 1 through 5, Eul’s evidence 1, and 2,
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the Republic of Camera (hereinafter referred to as "Kamera").
The plaintiff joined the CPP (Camon People) as a party member in Canada in 2013, and was engaged in political activities, such as participation of the party in the demonstration led by the party.
On April 8, 2016, a majority of the party members who participated in the demonstration were arrested. On April 8, 2016, the President's resignation and the election of new President were led by the party.
The plaintiff who participated in the demonstration also received an order from the police to attend the demonstration, but entered the Republic of Korea regardless of this order and dealt with it.
As such, if the plaintiff returned to Kamera, it is likely that the government of Kamera might be stuffed, so the plaintiff should be recognized as a refugee.
B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” (2) The aforementioned evidence and Eul’s pleading as mentioned in subparagraph 3 are the entire pleadings.