logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.23 2019나12083
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

A. The former geographical name prior to the reorganization, the military-related reference call (including the time of entry, discharge, training center, rank, work unit, military publication unit, photograph, etc.), and the name (including Gun), etc. of a person suffering from the same region (village), etc. at the same time sent a reply to the right to file a civil petition again. D. Meanwhile, around January 22, 2017, the deceased’s former reverse station certificate and the reserve forces pocket book were discovered. The name of the deceased’s former station certificate issued on January 22, 1965 is indicated as “B” and the date of birth as “C.” The name of the deceased’s reserve force published on the date of entry as “B, 50.8.15,” and “51.26, 51.26, 19, etc., and the name (including Gun) of the deceased’s former military manpower office** the Seoul regional military manpower office’s resident registration number**** the Seoul regional military manpower office and the Plaintiff’s name** 27.

F. The Plaintiff applied for the registration of bereaved family members of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the head of the Daegu Regional Veterans Office pursuant to the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State, and the head of the Daegu Regional Veterans Administration decided on December 13, 2017 as a soldier or policeman wounded in action among persons who have rendered distinguished services

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The public officials of the Defendant allegedly stated and managed the register of the deceased by negligence as follows, and provided false information to the bereaved family members of the deceased, including the Plaintiff, that there was no fact that the deceased participated in the 625 War, and caused the Plaintiff to file an application for registration of persons of distinguished service to the State and bereaved family members.

arrow