logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.01.16 2018구단5218 (2)
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. On December 7, 2017, the part of the Defendant’s credit-based brain injury, among the decisions pertaining to non-applicable persons of distinguished service to the State, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 9, 1965, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service from military service on December 9, 1967, when serving in the Army Association of Korea (hereinafter “the unit to which the Plaintiff belongs”).

B. On June 27, 1967, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with cerebral cerebral Bribery at the Army Hospital at the Army (hereinafter “military hospital”) in the military service. On March 17, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with “vertebrates and urines” (hereinafter “brates and urines”). On March 17, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with “vertebrates and urines” in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.

C. On September 2, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) on September 2, 2015, the Defendant was suffering from an accident where vehicles were transferred during the course of performing the operation of a communist communist communist communist communist communist communist communist communist communist Forces, located adjacent to the military unit to which the Plaintiff belongs; and (b) on September 2, 2015, the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State

) Pursuant to the application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “previous application for registration”).

(2) However, on February 1, 2016, the Defendant rendered a non-applicable decision to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff could not be deemed to have suffered from brupt wounds in the course of performing the operations of communist militias.

3) On February 16, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a revocation lawsuit under this Court Order 2016Gudan3775, which was dissatisfied with this, but on April 21, 2016, the Plaintiff was sentenced to dismissal judgment on the ground that the Plaintiff was not proven to have suffered from brudities in the course of performing the operation of armed communist militia, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as the Do governor on May 11, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “previous case”).

(D) On May 19, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State by asserting that he/she again incurred injury to the injury or injury of external wounds during the operation of armed communist militia bath again to the Defendant during the foregoing operation.

The plaintiff did not separately apply for registration of persons eligible for veteran's compensation, but shall apply for registration.

arrow