The defendant shall be innocent.

1. At around 03:40 on December 3, 2012, the Defendant collected two main bottles, which are dangerous articles on the table table for the victim, while drinking with the victim E (n, 40 years of age) and drinking at the main point of “D” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and drinking with the victim, and found the victim to have one-time head part of the victim, and led the victim to a two open emergency where treatment is required for about 14 days.

2. In the judgment criminal procedure, the evidence that there is a criminal fact must be presented by the prosecutor, and the criminal fact should be proven by the judge so that the judge can have high probability to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, and if there is no evidence to establish such a degree of conviction, the suspect is suspected of guilt even in the absence of evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

At the time, the defendant consistently asserts that the two-way disease does not have the head of the victim.

According to the statement of E, E, the police statement of E, the police interrogation protocol of E, the police interrogation protocol of the accused's second police interrogation protocol of the accused, the prosecutor's interrogation protocol of the accused's prosecutor's interrogation protocol of the accused, and the statement of E in each protocol of the accused's interrogation protocol of the accused, E is mutually consistent, and E's statement is generally consistent, and E's statement of the reasons for violence that the accused's defect in telephone conversationss with the man who was dead at the time of the defendant's interview and when E was at the time of the defendant's head as the Gap's own illness, there is doubt of guilt of guilt

However, there is no direct evidence of the fact that the defendant was at the time of the back of E as a two-way disease except each statement in E's investigative agency.

(E) Since the whereabouts of E are not identified, E could not be examined as a witness in the court, and immediately after the case, E had refused to make a statement in the police officer’s statement, and arrived at the earth on the day of the case.