The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Around 12:00 on February 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim E (the 43-year-old and south) does not pay the above PC usage fee of KRW 13,000 to the victim within the DPC bank operated by the Defendant at the time of Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant used the victim’s bath to read “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am am., I am.

Judgment

The evidence that there is a criminal fact in the criminal procedure shall be presented by the prosecutor, and even if the defendant's indictment is unreasonable and false, it shall not be disadvantageous to the defendant, and the criminal facts must be proven by the judge so that the judge can have high probability beyond reasonable doubt, and if there is no evidence establishing such a degree of conviction, even if there is suspicion of guilt against the defendant, it shall be judged as the benefit of the defendant.

In light of the relationship between the defendant and the victim E at the time of the instant case, the CCTV images taken the form at the time of the instant case were not clear; the defendant's side was reported to 112 at that time and sent out by the police; the police, despite hearing the defendant and the victim E's statement at that time; the victim E's attitude was changed from the police to this court in relation to the contents of the assault at the time of the instant case; the victim E's statement was changed from the police to this court; the contents of the victim E's statement at the time of the instant case; and the contents of the F's statement at the police station that appears to have been at the scene at the time of the instant case; it is difficult to believe that the remainder of the evidence submitted by the public prosecutor alone used the victim E as stated in the summary of the instant facts charged; and it is insufficient to find