logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.17 2013고합987
강도강간등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for 18 years.

The information on the accused shall be disclosed and notified for a period of ten years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] The defendant and the requester for attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") appear to be a clerical error in the indictment in light of the description of the investigation report (a copy of the judgment attached) by the Seoul District Court on May 21, 2003.

In the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims (Special Robbery, Rape, etc.) on January 27, 201, a person sentenced to 8 years of imprisonment and completed the execution of the above sentence on January 27, 201. On February 16, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced 2 years of imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes to the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and its judgment became final and conclusive after being sentenced to thief, and the previous conviction for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 37 of the Criminal Act are in the relation of latter concurrent crimes among the application of

On January 25, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims (Special Robbery, Rape, etc.).

Since a crime committed on January 25, 2013 in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims, etc. (Special Robbery, Rape, etc.) committed on May 21, 2003 was committed prior to the final and conclusive judgment of a crime in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims, etc. (Special Robbery, Rape, etc.) sentenced on May 21, 2003, the sentence may not be imposed or the sentence may not be mitigated or exempted in consideration of equity

(see Supreme Court Decision 2012Do9295, Sept. 27, 2012). / [Criminal Facts] The Defendant leased C and sirens that he/she became aware of as the motive of the prison in the course of running a prison life at the Young Military Prison in Seoul, and went back to the Seoul and the Seoul metropolitan area, and intrudes upon his/her residence, and carries out cash and precious metals.

arrow