logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.06.11 2011구합8094
토지보상금증액
Text

1. The plaintiffs' primary claims are dismissed.

2. The defendant shall grant the plaintiff A 113,929,040 won, the plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F respectively.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business Name: G development project (H) - Public notice: Defendant on October 14, 2008, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs notice I, J on October 1, 2009, K public notice by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 7, 2010

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s adjudication of expropriation on May 13, 201 (hereinafter “instant adjudication”): The land indicated in the column for “land to be expropriated” in the respective compensation details in attached Forms 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as “land to be expropriated” in the attached Forms 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands”) shall be deemed “land” according to the sequence; when the said land is collectively named, “compensation for expropriation” shall be deemed as indicated in the column for “adjudication for expropriation” among the compensation details in attached Forms 1 and 2, and this is calculated based on the arithmetic mean of each of the appraisal results at the time of the instant adjudication (hereinafter “adjudication”).

- An appraisal corporation: - An appraisal corporation on July 6, 2011 - An appraisal corporation: a dialogue appraisal corporation, a Sam Chang Chang-chul appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication appraiser”) / [based on recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Judgment as to the main claim

A. Of each of the instant lands belonging to H community district, land released from development-restricted zones on June 23, 2006 among the instant lands that belong to the Plaintiffs’ claim, it is apparent that the land was changed to Class I general residential area before June 26, 2006 without being designated as a housing site development-restricted zone on or before June 26, 2006. Therefore, in order to calculate reasonable compensation, the above land is assessed to be a Class I general residential area, not to be assessed as a standard for a natural green area which is a special-purpose area at the time of the designation of a housing site development-restricted zone, such as the appraisal of adjudication, but to be modified.

B. Attached Form of relevant statutes

3. The description; and

C. Each land of this case in fact of recognition No. 1

arrow