1. The Plaintiff, the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, the Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation, and the Defendant Gyeonggi-do Si Corporation, the amount of KRW 2,667,700, respectively, and each of them.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) A project approval and announcement (1) 2nd of the B internationalization planned district - C publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 30, 2008 - A project operator: the Defendants, the Gyeonggi-do Governor, and the Pyeongtaek Urban Development Project (2) - A project for the development of the B internationalization planned district publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 30, 208, and publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on January 2, 2009

(b) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on May 13, 201 - Each land subject to compensation: The land listed in the attached table Nos. 1 through 4 (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) owned by the Plaintiff - The project implementer: the amount of compensation for Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation - the amount corresponding to the amount indicated in the attached table of the adjudication on expropriation: The date of commencement of expropriation - the amount indicated in the attached table of the adjudication on expropriation of expropriation - the appraisal corporation which had been a stock company and the three appraisal corporations

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s adjudication on expropriation - Compensation subject to the Plaintiff’s adjudication on June 3, 201: Each land listed in [Attachment 5, 6] No. 5, and 6 (hereinafter “each land of this case,” including the land of this case 1 through 6) owned by the Plaintiff - The project implementer: the amount indicated in the column for the adjudication on expropriation of compensation amount: Defendant Gyeonggi-do Corporation - The expropriation commencement date: The amount corresponding to the amount indicated in the column for the adjudication on expropriation of compensation amount: July 27, 2011 - The appraisal corporation: one appraisal corporation; one appraisal corporation; one appraisal corporation; one appraisal corporation; one appraisal appraisal corporation (hereinafter “an appraisal corporation”; the result of the appraisal is referred to as “appraisal”; the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole, written evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number); and Eul’s evidence No. 1, 2 (including number number; hereinafter the same shall apply); or evidence No. 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The appraisal is based on the land category on the public register, and the amount of compensation is calculated on the basis of the land category on the public register. However, each of the instant land is land for factory.