1. The Defendant’s return of the application for the change of the purpose of use filed against the Plaintiff on July 24, 2013, and the report on the change of the purpose of use filed on July 26, 2013.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The majority of each land listed in the separate sheet located in a planned management area (the previous land category appears to have been forest land in the previous land; hereinafter “instant application site”) is the land subject to approval for alteration of purpose of use where the Plaintiff intended to change the type of business within five years from the date of completion inspection of restoration work pursuant to Article 21(1)1 of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act and Article 26(1)2(a) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, as the land that was used with permission for conversion of mountainous district to the Defendant for the purpose of using it as a building materials site yard, etc. on August 8, 2007 and February 20, 2008.

B. On January 17, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a construction report to the Defendant, including the legal fiction of authorization, permission, etc. for development activities, to newly build a ready-mixed factory with a total floor area of 6,633 square meters in a total of 10 square meters in the instant application site.

(hereinafter “instant building report”). C.

On January 22, 2013, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiff to supplement that the instant application form falls under the subject of approval for change of use under the Mountainous Districts Management Act, and the Plaintiff applied for approval to change the use of the instant application form to “Recon-factory” on February 5, 2013.

(hereinafter “instant application for change of use”). D.

On February 8, 2013, based on the contents of the instant building report, the Defendant submitted an opinion that “the permission for the development of a separate Do and the deliberation by the Si/Gun Planning Committee” from the urban construction division as a result of consultation with the relevant department on the matters for which the Plaintiff applied for the change of the purpose of use in the instant case. On February 22, 2013, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff to undergo an Gun Planning Committee on the instant application for the change of the purpose of use and to submit the deliberation materials, and received the relevant deliberation materials around that time, and on March 27, 2013, the