Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Where a person who has obtained permission for conversion of a mountainous district intends to use land used for a project for conversion of a mountainous district for another purpose within five years from the date of receiving inspection on completion of recovery, the approval shall be obtained from

On February 23, 2007, the Defendant obtained permission for conversion of mountainous districts of 1,343 square meters among Gyeonggi-gun E forest, 921 square meters among F forest, and 2,426 square meters among G forest, into mountainous districts of 1,342 square meters, for the purpose of creating a warehouse and an access road in H’s name, and received a completion inspection on April 21, 2008.

In addition, on July 31, 2008, the Defendant obtained permission for conversion of mountainous districts of 1,336 square meters among I forest, 2,086 square meters among J forest, 375 square meters among K forest, 2,078 square meters among L forest, and 5,875 square meters among L forest, for the purpose of creating a mid-term parking lot in the name of M, and received a completion inspection on around May 24, 201.

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

A. From December 2, 2012 to March 2013, 2013, a person uses the above E-forest land of 1,343 square meters converted for the purpose of building a warehouse without obtaining approval from Police Officers, as a field yard of stone, which is a ready-mixed material;

B. From March 2013 to March 2013, 2013, the said I forest 1,336 square meters, J forest 2,086 square meters, K forest 375 square meters, and 5,875 square meters in aggregate of 5,875 square meters in L forest 2,078 square meters and 2,078 square meters in ready-mixed material, were used as a field yard for sand source soil (before separating sand and soil).

Accordingly, the defendant used the converted land for another purpose without obtaining approval.

2. The Defendant violated the Farmland Act: (a) on March 2013, 2013, the Defendant used the farmland located outside the agriculture promotion area as a field yard where, without obtaining a farmland diversion permit from the first patrolman to the middle patrolman on March 2013, a total of 390 square meters and 550 square meters in total, which are farmland outside the agriculture promotion area, 390 square meters and 940 square meters in total, which are farmland located outside the agricultural promotion area.

Accordingly, the defendant has diverted farmland outside the agriculture promotion area without obtaining permission on diversion of farmland.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness P.