A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 6, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic) paid 250,000 won to G (n, 26 years old) through the “F” of smartphone-rating fishing method within the Eel located in Pyeongtaek-si D, and had a single sexual relationship with G.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as paragraph (1), has installed a camera in the shape of the key to a motor vehicle with the function of the video camera function marked above the display place where the intrusion can be seen, and taken a brue screen picture with a sexual intercourse, such as paragraph (1) G with the victim G in the state of body.

In addition, the Defendant taken video images against the Defendant’s will during a total of 10 times from April 7, 2012 to September 1, 2015, as shown in attached Table 1, as well as the form of sexual intercourse with the female victims.

3. The Defendant, as stated in paragraph (1), contacts with the victim G who became aware of sexual traffic, and continuously contact with the victim G with smartphone H.

The victim again proposed that the victim's sexual intercourse was defective, but the victim refused it, and if the victim did not accept his/her request, he/she had the intent to forcibly sexual intercourse with the victim by threatening the victim as if he/she spreads the sexually related video taken by the victim, such as Paragraph 2.

From August 31, 2012 to September 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) informed the victim of the fact that he/she taken a sexual intercourse with the victim by using H Messen from around August 31, 2012; and (b) informed the victim of the fact that he/she taken a sexual intercourse with the victim as referred to in paragraph (2); and (c) threatened the victim to spread the given video on the Internet if he/she did not accept his/her request for his/her sexual intercourse; (b) prevented the victim from resisting the victim of sexual intercourse; and (c) forced the victim to have sexual intercourse within the Eel located in Pyeongtaek-si D on September 17, 2012.

In addition, the Defendant from September 2, 2012 to December 10, 2015.