Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant shall work as the head of the field office in the dispute settlement planB, and the person who is awarded a contract from the construction of the Ansan-si and manages the work and safety management of sewage conduits and parking lots in front of the construction site in the case of Ansan-si, which is subcontracted by the construction of the fund settlement plan.

At around 09:50 on December 2, 2013, the Defendant, at the front of the Da road located in Ansan-si, had the victim E (the age of 65) (the age of 65) who was negligent in failing to take measures to prohibit traffic while neglecting the duty of care to install access signs, warning signs, safety belts, etc. to prevent any accident from passing through the bicycle-only road because the place where the Defendant, at the front of the Da road located in Ansan-si in Ansan-si, is one of the front sides of the road, is a place where many unspecified people pass along the road. Therefore, the Defendant, despite the duty of care to prevent traffic from passing through the above point, had the victim E (the age of 65) who was standing a bicycle due to negligence in the course of business and did not take measures to prohibit traffic.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from an incurable disease, such as an unexplosion damage in the number of days of treatment by negligence in the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A copy of a medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 268 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine (the defendant has no criminal records of the same kind or any criminal record of suspended execution, and the defendant is deemed to have violated his/her duty of care as a field manager at the time of the occurrence of the crime, but he/she retired from B after the occurrence of the crime in this case, and he/she currently retired from the corporation after the occurrence of the crime in this case, taking into account the fact that the civil litigation between

1. The Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;